Speik v. Sutphin , 15 Cal.2d 764
[L. A. No. 16530. In Bank. February 29, 1940.]
FREDERICK A. SPEIK, Appellant, v. I. O. SUTPHIN, Respondent.
COUNSEL
John W. Preston, Crump & Rogers and Wood, Crump & Rogers for Appellant.
Leland J. Allen for Respondent.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum
GIBSON, J.
[1] This is an action to quiet title and to obtain declaratory relief in respect to rights arising under an [15 Cal.2d 765] oil lease. The action raises the same issues as those presented in the companion case of Sutphin v. Speik, L. A. No. 17142 (ante, p. 195 [99 PaCal.2d 652]), this day decided. On the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.
Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Curtis, J., Waste, C.J., Wood, J., pro tem., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.
[End of Volume 15 Cal.2d]
Opinion Information
Parties
| 1 | FREDERICK A. SPEIK, Appellant, v. I. O. SUTPHIN (Respondent)
|
| 2 | I. O. SUTPHIN (Respondent)
|
| Disposition |
| Feb 29 1940 | Opinion: Affirmed |
