Reed v. Norman , 41 Cal.2d 901
[L. A. No. 21698. In Bank. May 12, 1953.]
HOYT REED, Appellant, v. CARL O. NORMAN et al., Respondents.
Hy Schwartz for Appellant.
John Earl Haskins, in pro. per., and Alfred Jay Luke for Respondents.
OPINION OF THE COURT
This appeal presents the same issues as those decided in Reed v. Norman, ante, p. 17 [256 P.2d 930] filed this day, and that decision is controlling herein.
The judgment is reversed.
[End of Volume 41 Cal.2d]
|Tue, 05/12/1953||41 Cal.2d 901||Review - Civil Appeal||Opinion issued |
|1||HOYT REED, Appellant, v. CARL O. NORMAN et al. (Respondent)|
|2||CARL O. NORMAN et al. (Respondent)|
|May 12 1953||Opinion: Reversed|