Supreme Court of California Justia
Citation 20 Cal.2d 894
In re Lacey



In re Lacey , 20 Cal.2d 894

[S. F. No. 16221. In Bank. Apr. 2, 1942.]

In re JOSEPH P. LACEY for Readmission to The State Bar of California.

COUNSEL

Edwin V. McKenzie, Walter E. Hettman, Edward P. Murphy and Leo Friedman for Petitioner. [20 Cal.2d 895]

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

THE COURT.

In accordance with the report and recommendation of the Board of Governors of The State Bar of California, it is ordered that Joseph P. Lacey be reinstated as a member of The State Bar of California, upon payment of the fees and taking the oath required by law.

Chierotti v. San Francisco Police Department (Mem.)

MEMORANDUM [20 Cal.2d 895] [S. F. No. 16646. In Bank. Apr. 2, 1942.]

JOHN CHIEROTTI, Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

Leo R. Friedman for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney General, J. Albert Hutchinson, Deputy Attorney General, Matthew Brady, District Attorney, and Joseph A. Garry, Assistant District Attorney, for Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

TRAYNOR, J.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion in People v. Gonzales and Chierotti, Crim. 4382, this day decided, ante, p. 165 [124 P. 2d 44], the order denying the preliminary injunction is affirmed.

Gibson, C.J., Shenk, J., Curtis, J., and Edmonds, J., concurred.

CARTER, J.,

Dissenting.

I dissent.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion this day filed in the case of People v. Gonzales and Chierotti, Criminal No. 4382, supra, I am of the opinion that the order denying the preliminary injunction should be reversed.

Houser, J., concurred.

Opinion Information
Date:Citation:Category:Status:
Thu, 04/02/194220 Cal.2d 894Review - Criminal AppealOpinion issued

Parties
1JOSEPH P. LACEY (Petitioner)

Disposition
Apr 2 1942Opinion: Affirmed