Powerine Oil Co. v. Super. Ct.

Filed 10/27/05


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

POWERINE OIL COMPANY, INC.,
Petitioner,
S113295
v.
Ct.App. 2/3 B156216
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY,
Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. VC025771
Respondent;
)
CENTRAL NATIONAL INSURANCE
COMPANY OF OMAHA et al.,
)

Real Parties in Interest.

MODIFICATION OF OPINION
The modification order filed in this matter on October 26, 2005, is revised
nunc pro tunc to read as follows:

THE COURT:


The opinion herein, appearing at 37 Cal.4th 377, is modified as follows:
The fourth sentence of the second full paragraph on page 397 is ordered
deleted.
The modification does not affect the judgment.



Opinion Information
Date: Docket Number:
Thu, 10/27/2005 S113295N
Parties
1 Central National Insurance Company Of Omaha (Real Party in Interest)
Represented by Carlos Emiliano Needham
O'Melveny & Myers, LLP
400 S Hope St
Los Angeles, CA
2 Complex Insurance Claims Litigation Association (Amicus curiae)
Represented by John J. Moura
Sinnott Dito Moura & Puebla
707 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 3200
Los Angeles, CA
3 Giller, Richard (Amicus curiae)
Represented by Richard C. Giller
Weston Benshoof et al LLP
333 S Hope St 16FL
Los Angeles, CA
4 Itt Industries, Inc. (Amicus curiae)
Represented by David Sean Cox
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
300 South Grand Avenue, Twenty-Second Fl
Los Angeles, CA
5 London Market Insurers (Amicus curiae)
Represented by William J. Baron
Hancock Rothert & Bunshoft
515 South Figueroa Street, 17th Floor
Los Angeles, CA
6 Los Angeles County Superior Court (Respondent)
7 Powerine Oil Company, Inc. (Petitioner)
Represented by David B. Goodwin
Heller Ehrman White Et Al
333 Bush Street
San Francisco, CA
8 Powerine Oil Company, Inc. (Petitioner)
Represented by David R. Isola
Isola Bowers LLP
701 S Ham Lane, Second Floor
Lodi, CA
9 United Policyholders (Amicus curiae)
Represented by Richard C. Giller
Weston Benshoof Rochefort Rubalcava & Maccuish
333 South Hope Street, 16FL
Los Angeles, CA
Disposition
Aug 29 2005 Opinion: Affirmed
Dockets
Jan 31 2003 Petition for review filed
real party Central National Insurance Company of Omaha
Feb 5 2003 Received Court of Appeal record
1 doghouse
Feb 11 2003 Received:
RPI'S errata to petition for review.
Feb 20 2003 Answer to petition for review filed
by counsel
Feb 21 2003 Request for depublication (petition for review pending)
real party Central National Insurance Company
Feb 24 2003 Received letter from:
real party Central National Insurance Company
Mar 3 2003 Opposition filed
By counsel for petitioner {Powerine Oil Company} to request for depublication.
Mar 21 2003 Time extended to grant or deny review
To May 2, 2003.
Apr 23 2003 Petition for Review Granted (civil case)
Votes: George, CJ., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Brown and Moreno, JJ.,
May 5 2003 Certification of interested entities or persons filed
By counsel for petitioner {Powerine Oil Company}.
May 6 2003 Certification of interested entities or persons filed
real party Central National Insurance Company
May 14 2003 Request for extension of time filed
real party Central National Insurance>>opening brief to 6-23-03
May 14 2003 Received Court of Appeal record
remaining one doghouse sent overnight.
May 20 2003 Extension of time granted
To June 23, 2003 to file RPI's Opening Brief on the Merits.
Jun 23 2003 Opening brief on the merits filed
real party Central National Insurance
Jun 23 2003 Request for judicial notice filed (in non-AA proceeding)
real party Central National Insurance [2 vols of exhibits rec'd]
Jun 23 2003 Received:
out of state authorities>>real party Central National Insurance Company
Jul 3 2003 Request for extension of time filed
By Petitioner {Powerine Oil Company Inc.,} asking until August 22, 2003 to file Petitioner's Answer Brief on the Merits.
Jul 9 2003 Extension of time granted
To August 22, 2003 to file petitioner's Answer Brief on the Merits.
Aug 22 2003 Answer brief on the merits filed
By counsel for petitioner {Powerine Oil Company Inc.,}.
Aug 26 2003 Request for extension of time filed
reply brief/merits to 10-1-03>>real party Central National Insurance
Aug 29 2003 Request for extension of time filed
RPI {Central National Insurance} requesting to 10/6/2003 to file RPI's Reply Brief on the Merits.
Sep 9 2003 Extension of time granted
To October 6, 2003 to file RPI'S {Central National Insurance Company of Omaha} Reply Brief on the Merits.
Oct 6 2003 Reply brief filed (case fully briefed)
by RPI Central National Insurance Company of Omaha
Oct 14 2003 Received application to file amicus curiae brief; with brief
Complex Ins. Claims Litigation Association in support of Central Nat'l Ins. Co. [App & Brief under separate covers.]
Oct 21 2003 Permission to file amicus curiae brief granted
Complex Insurance Claims Litigation Association in support of RPI.
Oct 21 2003 Amicus curiae brief filed
Complex Insurance Claims Litigation Association in support of RPI {Central National Insurance Company of Omaha}. Answer is due within twenty days.
Nov 4 2003 Response to amicus curiae brief filed
By petitioner {Powerine Oil Company Inc.} to AC Brief filed by Complex Insurance Claims Litigation Association.
Nov 5 2003 Received application to file amicus curiae brief; with brief
Application and Brief under same cover of United PolicyHolders Richard Giller.
Nov 5 2003 Received application to file amicus curiae brief; with brief
ITT Industires Inc., app./ brief under saparate cover supports petnr. Powerine Oil Co., Inc.
Nov 6 2003 Received application to file Amicus Curiae Brief
London Market Insurers in support of RPI {Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha}./ 40(K).
Nov 13 2003 Permission to file amicus curiae brief granted
London Market Insurers Insurers in support of Real Party in Interest.
Nov 13 2003 Amicus curiae brief filed
London Market Insurers in support of Real Party in Interest. Answer is due witin twenty days.
Nov 14 2003 Permission to file amicus curiae brief granted
United Policyholders and Richard Giller in support of Petitioner.
Nov 14 2003 Amicus curiae brief filed
United Policyholders and Richard Giller in support of petitioner. Answer is due within twenty days.
Nov 14 2003 Permission to file amicus curiae brief granted
ITT Industries, Inc., in support of petitioner.
Nov 14 2003 Amicus curiae brief filed
ITT Industries, Inc., in support of petitioner. Answer is due within twenty days.
Nov 14 2003 Received letter from:
O'Melveny & Myers LLP dated Nov 14, 2003. advising court of a new CA opinion.
Dec 1 2003 Request for extension of time filed
Petitioner {Powerine Oil Company Inc.,} request a 2-day extension to December 5, 2003 to file petitioner's Response to AC Brief filed by London Market Insurers.
Dec 1 2003 Extension of time granted
To December 5, 2003 to file Petitioner's Response to AC Brief filed by London Market Insurers.
Dec 1 2003 Request for extension of time filed
Real party -> Central National Ins. Company of Omaha to file its answer to a.c. briefs of United Policyholders and ITT Ind. [a one day reqt to Dec. 5th]
Dec 5 2003 Extension of time granted
To December 5, 2003 to file RPI'S Response to AC Brief filed by United Policyholders and ITT Industries, Inc.,
Dec 5 2003 Response to amicus curiae brief filed
By petitioner {Powerine Oil Company, Inc.,} to AC Brief filed by London Market Insurers.
Dec 5 2003 Response to amicus curiae brief filed
Central National Insurance Company's "Combined" Response to Amicus Briefs of ITT Ind., Inc. and United Policyholders/Richard Giller.
Dec 23 2004 Filed:
letter from counsel for petitioner {Powerine Oil Co.,} dated December 23, 2004 re: recent decision of the Illinois Supreme Court (Central Illinois Light Co., v. Home Ins. Co. (Ill. Dec. 2, 2004.))
Jan 3 2005 Filed:
letter of RPI, ("Central National") in response to letter of petitioner ("Powerine"), dated Dec. 23rd..
Jan 12 2005 Filed:
Letter from counsel for petitioner dated January 12, 2005 in response to RPI's letter.
May 3 2005 Case ordered on calendar
6/2/05, 9am, LA
May 25 2005 Request for judicial notice granted
The request for judicial notice filed on June 23, 2003, is hereby granted.
Jun 2 2005 Cause argued and submitted
Aug 29 2005 Opinion filed: Judgment affirmed in full
The judgment of the Court of Appeal directing the trial court to enter an order denying the insurer's motion for summary adjudication of the duty to indemnify is affirmed, and the matter is remanded to the Court of Appeal for further procedings consistent with the views expressed herein. Opinion by Baxter, J. -----joined by George, C.J., Kennard, Werdegar, Chin & Moreno, JJ.
Sep 13 2005 Request for modification of opinion filed
By counsel for petitioner, Powerine Oil Company. Request for modification of Page 22 of the Court's Opinion
Sep 13 2005 Request for modification of opinion filed
By counsel for Aerojet-General Corporation. Requesting modification on page 22.
Sep 20 2005 Filed letter from:
counsel for real party in interest("CENTRAL NATIONAL") responding to petitioner ("POWERINE II") letter dated 09-13-05 re: modification of opinion.
Sep 29 2005 Time extended to consider modification or rehearing
Finality of the opinion in the above-entitled case is hereby extended to and including October 28, 2005.
Oct 26 2005 Opinion modified - no change in judgment
Oct 26 2005 Order filed
Opinion modified.
Oct 27 2005 Order filed
Nunc pro tunc correction of 10/26/05 modification order to note judgment not affected by modification.
Oct 31 2005 Remittitur issued (civil case)
Nov 7 2005 Received:
receipt for remittitur CA 2/3.
Briefs
Jun 23 2003 Opening brief on the merits filed
Aug 22 2003 Answer brief on the merits filed
Oct 6 2003 Reply brief filed (case fully briefed)
Oct 21 2003 Amicus curiae brief filed
Nov 4 2003 Response to amicus curiae brief filed
Nov 13 2003 Amicus curiae brief filed
Nov 14 2003 Amicus curiae brief filed
Nov 14 2003 Amicus curiae brief filed
Dec 5 2003 Response to amicus curiae brief filed
Dec 5 2003 Response to amicus curiae brief filed

If you'd like to submit a brief document to be included for this opinion, please submit an e-mail to the SCOCAL website.

Supreme Court of California Justia