Supreme Court of California Justia
Citation 9 Cal.2d 779
Lakeview Creamery Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County



Lakeview Creamery Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 9 Cal.2d 779

[L. A. No. 16003. In Bank. May 26, 1937.]

LAKEVIEW CREAMERY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

Sylvan Y. Allen and Harry C. Hedberg for Petitioners.

Everett W. Mattoon, County Counsel, Douglas DeCoster, Chief Deputy County Counsel, Lewis D. Sollings and Amos Friedman for Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

THE COURT.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent superior court, and in particular, Judge Schmidt, to settle a reporter's transcript on appeal. On August 26, 1936, we issued an order to show cause directed to respondents.

[1] Our decision in Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co., L. A. No. 15888 (ante, p. 16 [68 PaCal.2d 968]), this day filed, disposes of the present case.

The petition is denied.

Opinion Information
Date:Citation:Category:Status:
Wed, 05/26/19379 Cal.2d 779Review - Civil AppealOpinion issued

Parties
1LAKEVIEW CREAMERY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al. (Respondent)
2LAKEVIEW CREAMERY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al. (Petitioners)
3SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al. (Respondent)

Disposition
May 26 1937Denied