IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
DVD COPY CONTROL
ASSOCATION, INC.
Plaintiff and Respondent,
S102588
v.
) Ct.App.
6
H021153
ANDREW BUNNER,
Santa Clara County
Defendant and Appellant.
) Super. Ct. No. CV786804
___________________________________ ) MODIFICATION OF OPINION
BY THE COURT:
The opinion herein, filed August 25, 2003, appearing at 31 Cal.4th 864, is
modified as follows:
On page 872, the third sentence of the second full paragraph on that page is
deleted and in its place is inserted the following sentence: “Despite receiving these
notices, many of these Web sites refused to remove the information.”
This modification does not affect the judgment.
Opinion Information
Date: | Docket Number: |
Wed, 10/15/2003 | S102588M |
Parties
1 | Dvd Copy Control Association (Plaintiff and Respondent) Represented by Jared Ben Bobrow WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA |
2 | Dvd Copy Control Association (Plaintiff and Respondent) Represented by Christopher J. Cox Weil, Gotshal & Manges 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA |
3 | Dvd Copy Control Association (Plaintiff and Respondent) Represented by Robert B. Sugarman Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Ave. New York, NY |
4 | Bunner, Andrew (Defendant and Appellant) Represented by Allonn Emanuel Levy Hopkins & Carley 70 South First St. San Jose, CA |
5 | Bunner, Andrew (Defendant and Appellant) Represented by Thomas Edward Moore Tolinson Zisko et al 200 Page Mill Road, 2nd Floor Palo Alto, CA |
6 | Bunner, Andrew (Defendant and Appellant) Represented by James R. Wheaton Environmental Law Foundation 1736 Franklin St., 9th Floor Oakland, CA |
7 | Lockyer, Bill (Amicus curiae) Represented by Regina Jaynell Brown Deputy Attorney General 1515 Clay St., 20th Fl. Oakland, CA |
8 | Microsoft Corporation (Amicus curiae) Represented by Richard Allen Epstein Univ. Of Chicago Law School 1111 East 60th St. Chicago, IL |
9 | Intellectual Property Owners Association (Amicus curiae) Represented by James Henry A. Pooley Milbank, Tweed et al 630 Hansen Way, 2nd Fl. Palo Alto, CA |
10 | Motion Picture Association Of America (Amicus curiae) Williams & Connolly, LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20005 Represented by Daniel Ernest Robbins Graham & James 15503 Ventura Blvd. Encino, CA |
11 | Computer Professionals For Social Responsibility (Amicus curiae) Represented by Jennifer S. Granick Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Crown Quadrangle Stanford, CA |
12 | Aclu Foundation Of Northern California, Inc. (Amicus curiae) 125 Broad Street (attn: Ann Beeson) New York, NY 10004 Represented by Ann Brick American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Of No Ca 1663 Mission Street, Suite 460 San Francisco, CA |
13 | Silha Center For Study Of Media Ethics & Law (Amicus curiae) attn: Jane Kirtley, University of Minnesota 206 Church St. SE, 111 Murphy Hall Minneapolis, MN 55455 |
14 | Intellectual Property Law Professors (Amicus curiae) c/o Jennifer M. Urban, Samuelson Law Clinic Univ. of Cal., 396 Simon Hall Berkeley , CA 94720 |
15 | American Federation Of Musicians (Amicus curiae) c/o Janet Fisher, Williams & Connolly LLP 725 Twelfth St., N.W. Washington, DC 20005 |
16 | American Federation Of Television & Radio Artists (Amicus curiae) c/o Roger Milgrim, Paul, Hastings et al 75 E. 55th St. New York, NY 10022 |
Disposition | |
Aug 25 2003 | Opinion: Reversed |
Dockets | |
Dec 4 2001 | Petition for review filed Respondent DVD Copy Control Association |
Dec 4 2001 | Record requested |
Dec 5 2001 | Received Court of Appeal record 2-file jackets, briefs and 2-accordion folders |
Dec 24 2001 | Answer to petition for review filed by counsel for RPI |
Jan 25 2002 | Time extended to grant or deny review to and including March 4, 2002. |
Feb 20 2002 | Petition for Review Granted (civil case) Votes: George, CJ., Baxter, Chin, Brown, and Moreno, JJ. Kennard, J., was recused and did not participate. |
Mar 25 2002 | Opening brief on the merits filed by counsel for resp DVD (timely per Rule 40k) |
Apr 3 2002 | Request for extension of time filed for aplt to file the answer brief on the merits, to 5-22. |
Apr 10 2002 | Extension of time granted to 5-22-02 for aplt Bunner to file the answer brief on the merits. No further extensions will be granted. |
May 22 2002 | Answer brief on the merits filed Appellant [ Bunner ] |
Jun 12 2002 | Reply brief filed (case fully briefed) by resp. (timely per Rule 40k) |
Jul 3 2002 | Request for extension of time filed by Attorney General to August 2, 2002 to file amicus curiae brief. |
Jul 8 2002 | Extension of time granted to 8-2-02 for the A.G. to file the amicus curiae brief. Any answers to the A/C brief maybe filed by 8/22/02. |
Jul 11 2002 | Received application to file amicus curiae brief; with brief by Intellectual Property Law Professors, Computer & Communications Industry Assn., and the U.S Public Policy Committee of the Assn. for Computing Machinery. |
Jul 11 2002 | Received application to file amicus curiae brief; with brief by the Intellectual Property Owners Assn. in support of resp. |
Jul 11 2002 | Received application to file amicus curiae brief; with brief by Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility. |
Jul 11 2002 | Received application to file amicus curiae brief; with brief by ACLU and Silha Center for Study of Media Ethics in support of aplt. |
Jul 11 2002 | Received application to file amicus curiae brief; with brief by Microsoft Corp., Ford Motor Co., Boeing Co., AOL Time Warner Inc., BellSouth Corp., Sears Roebuck Co., Proctor& Gamble Co., Coca-Cola Co., and the Nat. Assn. of Manufacturers in support of resp. |
Jul 11 2002 | Received application to file amicus curiae brief; with brief by Motion Picture Assn. of America, American Federation of Musicians, et al, in support of resp. with Notice of Lodging Non-Calif. Authorities in support of A/C brief. |
Jul 19 2002 | Permission to file amicus curiae brief granted by Intellectual Property Law Professors et al. Any answers may be filed w/in 20 days. |
Jul 19 2002 | Amicus Curiae Brief filed by: Intellectual Property Law Prof. et al. |
Jul 19 2002 | Permission to file amicus curiae brief granted by Intellectual Property Owners Assn. in support of resp. Answers w/in 20 days. |
Jul 19 2002 | Amicus Curiae Brief filed by: Intellectual Prop. Owners Assn. in suppt of resp |
Jul 19 2002 | Permission to file amicus curiae brief granted by Computer Professionals For Social Responsibility. Answers w/in 20 days. |
Jul 19 2002 | Amicus Curiae Brief filed by: Computer Prof. for Social Responsibility |
Jul 19 2002 | Permission to file amicus curiae brief granted by American Civil Liberties Union et al in support of aplt. Answers w/in 20 days. |
Jul 19 2002 | Amicus Curiae Brief filed by: A.C.L.U. et al in suppt of aplt. |
Jul 19 2002 | Permission to file amicus curiae brief granted by Microsoft Corp et al in support of resp. Answers w/in 20 days. |
Jul 19 2002 | Amicus Curiae Brief filed by: Microsoft Corp. et al in suppt of resp. |
Jul 19 2002 | Permission to file amicus curiae brief granted by Motion Picture Association of America et al in support of resp. Answers w/in 20 days. |
Jul 19 2002 | Amicus Curiae Brief filed by: Motion Picture Assn. of America et al in suppt of resp. One vol. of non-Calif. authorities lodged herewith. |
Jul 31 2002 | Application to appear as counsel pro hac vice (granted case) by David E. Kendall (for A/C Motion Picture Assn. of America et al) |
Jul 31 2002 | Application to appear as counsel pro hac vice (granted case) by Roger Milgrim for amicus curiae Motion Picture Association of America et al. |
Aug 2 2002 | Amicus Curiae Brief filed by: Attorney General Lockyer in support of respondent |
Aug 5 2002 | Received letter from: Hitachi Data Systems (non-party) |
Aug 5 2002 | Received letter from: AOL Time Warner (non-party) |
Aug 7 2002 | Application to appear as counsel pro hac vice granted by Roger M. Milgrim for amicus curiae |
Aug 7 2002 | Application to appear as counsel pro hac vice granted David E. Kendall for amicus curiae |
Aug 8 2002 | Response to amicus curiae brief filed counsel for respondent (DVD Copy Control) to amicus curiae briefs in support of appellant (A. Bunner). |
Aug 9 2002 | Response to amicus curiae brief filed by counsel for appellant (A. Bunner) to amicus briefs in support of respondent. (40k) |
Aug 22 2002 | Response to amicus curiae brief filed by aplt to amicus brief of A.G. |
Feb 7 2003 | Motion to Dismiss filed (for mootness) by aplt |
Feb 11 2003 | Request for extension of time filed By counsel for Respondent {DVD Copy Control Asson. INC.,} asking until February 25, 2003 to file Respondent's Response to Appellant's Motion to Dismiss for Mootness. |
Feb 14 2003 | Extension of time granted To February 25, 2003 to file Respondent's Answer to Appellant's Motion to Dismiss for mootness. |
Feb 25 2003 | Filed: Resp DVD's opposition to motion to dismiss. |
Mar 5 2003 | Received document entitled: Deft. Bunner's reply in support of his motion to dismiss for mootness. |
Apr 30 2003 | Case ordered on calendar 5-29-03, 9am, S.F. |
May 14 2003 | Motion to dismiss denied Defendant Andrew Bunner's Motion to Dismiss for Mootness is denied. Kennard, J., and Chin, J., were recused and did not participate. Moreno, J., is of the opinion the motion should be granted. |
May 23 2003 | Filed letter from: Robert Sugarman, counsel for resp, notifying court that he wishes to allocate 10 min. of oral argument to A.G. Bill Lockyer. (faxed) |
May 23 2003 | Order filed The letter filed by counsel for respondent DVD Copy Control Assn. on May 23, 2003, is treated as a request to divide oral argument time under Calif. Rules of Court, rule 29.2(f)(2). The request to allocate 10 minutes of its oral argument time to amicus curiae Attorney General of California is granted. |
May 23 2003 | Application to appear as counsel pro hac vice (granted case) by Robert G. Sugarman for respondent |
May 23 2003 | Application to appear as counsel pro hac vice granted The application of Robert. G Sugarman to appear as pro hac vice for resp at oral argument is granted. |
May 29 2003 | Cause argued and submitted |
May 29 2003 | Filed: by counsel for petitioner (Bunner) Substitution of Attorney. former legal rep. HS Law Group new legal rep. Allonn E. Levy, Esq. |
Aug 25 2003 | Opinion filed: Judgment reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion. Majority Opinion by Brown, J. --------joined by George, C.J., Baxter, Rivera*, Robie*, JJ. (*assigned justices) Concurring opinion by Werdegar, J. Concurring opinion by Moreno, J. |
Sep 8 2003 | Rehearing petition filed by aplt |
Sep 15 2003 | Time extended to consider modification or rehearing to and including November 21, 2003, or the date upon which rehearing is either granted or denied, whichever occurs first. |
Sep 16 2003 | Answer to rehearing petition filed by counsel for respondent (DVD Copy Control Assoc., Inc.) |
Oct 15 2003 | Rehearing denied Kennard, J., was recused and did not participate. Baxter, J., was absent and did not participate. Chin, J., was recused and did not participate. |
Oct 15 2003 | Opinion modified - no change in judgment |
Oct 15 2003 | Remittitur issued (civil case) |
Oct 24 2003 | Note: records returned to CA 6 |
Briefs | |
Mar 25 2002 | Opening brief on the merits filed |
May 22 2002 | Answer brief on the merits filed |
Jun 12 2002 | Reply brief filed (case fully briefed) |
Jul 19 2002 | Amicus Curiae Brief filed by: |
Jul 19 2002 | Amicus Curiae Brief filed by: |
Jul 19 2002 | Amicus Curiae Brief filed by: |
Jul 19 2002 | Amicus Curiae Brief filed by: |
Jul 19 2002 | Amicus Curiae Brief filed by: |
Jul 19 2002 | Amicus Curiae Brief filed by: |
Aug 2 2002 | Amicus Curiae Brief filed by: |
Aug 8 2002 | Response to amicus curiae brief filed |
Aug 9 2002 | Response to amicus curiae brief filed |
Aug 22 2002 | Response to amicus curiae brief filed |