Supreme Court of California Justia
Citation 39 Cal.2d 891
City of Culver City v. Superior Court



City of Culver City v. Superior Court , 39 Cal.2d 891

[L. A. No. 22311. In Bank. Nov. 21, 1952.]

CITY OF CULVER CITY et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent.

COUNSEL

M. Tellefson, City Attorney, and E. L. Searle for Petitioners.

Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, and Howard S. Goldin, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

THE COURT.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in City of Vernon v. Superior Court, this day filed, ante, p. 839 [___ P.2d ___], the superior court order under review is modified to remit the previously ordered punishment.

CARTER, J.

I concur in the conclusion reached for the same reasons as stated in my concurring opinion in City of Vernon v. Superior Court, this day filed, ante, p. 844 [250 P.2d 241].

[End of Volume 39 Cal.2d]

Opinion Information
Date:Citation:Category:Status:
Fri, 11/21/195239 Cal.2d 891Review - Civil AppealOpinion issued

Parties
1CITY OF CULVER CITY et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (Respondent)
2CITY OF CULVER CITY et al. (Petitioners)
3SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (Respondent)

Disposition
Nov 21 1952Opinion: Affirmed