Citation 41 Cal.2d 901
Reed v. Norman
Reed v. Norman , 41 Cal.2d 901
[L. A. No. 21698. In Bank. May 12, 1953.]HOYT REED, Appellant, v. CARL O. NORMAN et al., Respondents.
COUNSEL
Hy Schwartz for Appellant.
John Earl Haskins, in pro. per., and Alfred Jay Luke for Respondents.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum
THE COURT.
This appeal presents the same issues as those decided in Reed v. Norman, ante, p. 17 [256 P.2d 930] filed this day, and that decision is controlling herein.
The judgment is reversed.
[End of Volume 41 Cal.2d]
Opinion Information
| Date: | Citation: | Category: | Status: |
| Tue, 05/12/1953 | 41 Cal.2d 901 | Review - Civil Appeal | Opinion issued |
Parties
| 1 | CARL O. NORMAN et al. (Respondent) |
| 2 | HOYT REED, Appellant, v. CARL O. NORMAN et al. (Respondent) |
| Disposition | |
| May 12 1953 | Opinion: Reversed |
