Citation 11 Cal.2d 779

Sachse v. Craemer

Sachse v. Craemer, 11 Cal.2d 779

[L. A. No. 16582. In Bank. June 10, 1938.]

RICHARD SACHSE, Petitioner, v. JUSTUS F. CRAEMER, as Building and Loan Commissioner, etc., Respondent.

COUNSEL

John C. Campbell and Franz R. Sachse for Petitioner.

Clock, McWhinney & Clock and James C. Ingebretsen for Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

THE COURT.

This is a companion case to the case of The Ventura Co., Inc., v. Craemer, this day decided (ante, p. 407 [80 PaCal.2d 720]). [1] On the authority of that decision and for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed therein the petitioner herein is entitled to the writ of mandamus.

Let the peremptory writ issue.

Opinion Information
Date: Citation: Category: Status:
Fri, 06/10/1938 11 Cal.2d 779 Review - Civil Appeal Opinion issued
Parties
1 JUSTUS F. CRAEMER, as Building and Loan Commissioner, etc. (Respondent)
2 RICHARD SACHSE (Petitioner)
3 RICHARD SACHSE, Petitioner, v. JUSTUS F. CRAEMER, as Building and Loan Commissioner, etc. (Respondent)
Disposition
Jun 10 1938 Writ Issued
Supreme Court of California Justia